Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Will Ben Stiller Bring Blue Steel to 'I Am Chippendales'?

ben still i am chippendalesThe male bump-and-grind is getting a new twist with Alan Ball's "I Am Chippendales," and it's possible that Ben Stiller will join the fun. Actually, the Ladies of Tampa should probably hold on to their dollar bills for now, as this biopic sounds like it's even darker than "Magic Mike." (Yeah, we'll say it. "Magic Mike" is kinda depressing!)



According to Variety, Ben Stiller is in talks to play Nicholas De Noia, a TV producer and choreographer for the original "Chippendales" who was found shot in his office in 1987. And that's just the tip of the iceberg in this crazy tale, which encompasses murder, murder-for-hire, dubious financial doings, and much more. It will be based on Rodney Sheldon's book about the franchise's beginnings, and its founders Paul Snider and Somen Banerjee. Ball, who is the mastermind behind "True Blood," "Six Feet Under," and "American Beauty," knows from sex, death, and despair, so this should be an interesting outing.



"Magic Mike 2" will start filming this fall, but there's room in our hearts for plenty of movies about the shady world of male strippers. Even ones that seem to focus on the more business side of things, we suppose. Joe Manganiello, who plays Big Dick Richie in "Magic Mike," has even directed his own doc about the Dallas strip club La Bare. Appropriately enough, the doc is called "La Bare."





from The Moviefone Blog http://ift.tt/1pIMIlt

via IFTTT

The 'How I Met Your Mother' Finale Left Me Confused, Angry, and Blindsided

how i met your mother finale

As I sat down last night to watch the series finale of "How I Met Your Mother," my mind turned to "The Office."



Like HIMYM, "The Office" was a series that was stellar in its earlier years, before going through a bit of a rough patch with a handful of regrettable, sub-par seasons, ultimately limping into its ninth year as a hollow shell of its once-great former self. And yet, I'm still filled with positive feelings about the folks at Dunder Mifflin, thanks in part to last year's perfect series finale that was sappy, yes, and perhaps too neat, but reminded me of why I had loved the show for so long in the first place. I was satisfied.



So how do I feel after HIMYM's final bow? Certainly not satisfied; confused is more like it. A bit angry, a little bitter, and definitely blindsided, though perhaps that was naive, considering all the signs that pointed to last night's conclusion. While texting my best friend during commercial breaks, I told her that I expected the writers were setting us up for exactly the ending we got: Ted meets the mother; the mother dies; Ted gets with Robin. But that doesn't mean I was happy about it.



For fans who have been with the gang from the beginning (full disclosure: I binged on the first two seasons and began watching live in season three), it seemed like series creators Carter Bays and Craig Thomas wasted years of viewers' time by forcing us into believing Robin and Barney as a couple, only to backtrack on their entire relationship during the first 20 minutes of the finale. Why on Earth would you set the entirety of season nine during their wedding weekend if their wedding is ultimately meaningless? Why have Robin repeatedly reject Ted, then have Ted reject Robin, only to have them wind up together after all? Why did they make Robin literally float away in the air in the cheesiest metaphor ever?



Bays and Thomas's attempts at misdirection seem understandable when the entire point of the show isn't the "Mother" component so much as the "How," but this type of bait and switch just seemed cheap. Ted deserved his happy ending, but most fans understood that that meant he'd find it with the mother. While her death was upsetting, it wasn't completely unexpected, thanks to some heavy foreshadowing; what was truly shocking was how quickly it seemed Ted -- and his kids -- got over it. Penny's exasperated declaration that he was telling them the story because he was still in love with Robin didn't really ring true. Can you honestly say if you were in her shoes that you'd roll your eyes at your dad's lame stories about your dead mom and immediately push him into dating your aunt? Ted's kids have been used as a stand-in for the viewers at home for a while now, but this was one bit of exposition that didn't work for me at all.



In the end, I think many fans will feel about HIMYM how I do about "The Office": it was a great show with some not-so-great moments that eventually came to a satisfying conclusion. I just don't think I can bring myself to agree. I know that of my Facebook friends, reactions to the finale were pretty evenly split among the "loved it" and "hated it" camps. (One girl in the latter group summed up her frustration thusly: "Kill yourself, How I Met Your Mother. Seriously.") I'm somewhere in the middle. I thought the episode's commentary on the ever-evolving state of adult friendships was spot-on; I thought the callbacks were well-played (I was secretly hoping "Have you met Ted?" would be used on the mother); I thought everything involving the mother was great.



And it's for all those reasons that I just can't sign off on the series finale. I wanted more of those moments sprinkled throughout season nine, instead of crammed into the show's final hour. I wanted the detour-filled journey Bays and Thomas took us on to have some bigger purpose. I just don't think it did, at least not in the length of time it took us to get here, through several seasons' worth of the endless Robin and Ted merry-go-round that always ended in the same place: they just don't work as a couple. How things are expected to be different now that they're older and the alleged love of Ted's life is dead (and conveniently and cruelly relegated to an afterthought) is never explained or explored beyond the big, blue french horn gesture. In many ways, that gesture proves Ted and Robin are still the same people they were in the fall of 2005 -- and they didn't work out then, either.



Much of the critical reaction to the finale has asked if fans were cheated, or if the show was really worth watching at all. After considering those questions all night and into this afternoon, I still don't know my answers, though for the second query, I'm tempted to say no. I was thinking of re-watching the entire series once the finale aired, and now, knowing what I know, I just can't bring myself to do it. Maybe I'll change my mind in the days and weeks to come.



But denying that this series has been a constant, familiar, comforting weekly presence, even in its worst times (cough *Zoey* cough), and that I'll miss it in spite of everything that happened last night, also seems wrong. The very fact that I (and so many others) have had such a strong, visceral reaction to the show's outcome proves that it was indeed worth watching, that it indeed meant something, even if every individual fan has her own definition of that meaning. Perhaps that's why the finale stung so much -- because for some of us, it felt as if our meaning was proven wrong.






from The Moviefone Blog http://ift.tt/1i0S7An

via IFTTT

'Top Gun 2' With Drones? No, This Is Not an April Fools' Day Joke.

top gun 2 drones

Producer Jerry Bruckheimer is bound and determined to bring "Top Gun 2" to life, and he won't rest until we're all back in the danger zone with Tom Cruise. Bruckheimer was on HuffPost Live to discuss his bio, "Jerry Bruckheimer: When Lightning Strikes, Four Decades of Filmmaking," and naturally the conversation turned to his nearly 30-year war of attrition to make a sequel about hot-to-trot Navy pilots.



Of course, technology -- and the way we wage war -- has changed a whole lot since Iceman and Goose and Maverick were flashing their toothy smiles, so the real question was how to update it for the 21st century.



"Don [Simpson] and I tried to develop something, we didn't succeed. [Tom] Cruise took over, and he tried to develop something, and he didn't succeed. Now we're back at it. Tony Scott finally found a way in to do this, and we were on the road to make the picture. Unfortunately, he passed away," Bruckheimer said. ("Top Gun" director Scott died in 2012.)



"The concept is, basically, are the pilots obsolete because of drones? Cruise is going to show them that they're not obsolete. The pilots are here to stay. So that's the concept of it. It's just getting to the starting place. Unfortunately -- or fortunately for Tom -- he's very busy, so you have to find a slot he can fit into and get a budget that Paramount feels they can make the picture," he added.



Although Cruise seems reluctant to give up the role of action hero, doing a "Top Gun" sequel as an older and wiser dude guiding a new generation would be a cool way to approach things. Of course, wanting to make a sequel is very different from actually setting it in motion.



We checked the date on this and everything, so it seems like this is not actually a prank.



Cruise's next film, "Edge of Tomorrow," is headed to theaters June 6.



[H/T Hollywood Reporter]





from The Moviefone Blog http://ift.tt/1iX94io

via IFTTT

The Trailer for Paul Walker's 1994 Movie 'Tammy and the T-Rex' Is Absolutely Insane (VIDEO)

tammy and the t-rex

After his untimely and tragic death last year, Paul Walker left behind a filmography that included plenty of hits ... and a few misses. Like this gem, titled "Tammy and the T-Rex," from 1994. In the movie, Paul Walker plays a teen who is mauled to death by a lion after a group of bullies drop him in a safari park, much to the dismay of his girlfriend, played by Denise Richards. Naturally, a mad scientist places his brain inside an animatronic dinosaur, and Walker uses his new claws and teeth to get revenge and somehow convince his human girlfriend that he's a T-rex now. I smell a remake!





from The Moviefone Blog http://ift.tt/1fKVWsN

via IFTTT

The 11 Most Badass American Movie Actors (PHOTOS)

Most Badass American Actors

Plenty of actors act tough and reckless off screen, but these American-born stars personify what it means to be badass and heroic in front of the camera.



Long before Johnny Depp trashed a hotel room and Shia LaBeouf made headlines for fisticuffs, John Wayne and Clint Eastwood were being celebrated by fans for their portrayals of tough gunslingers and grisly macho men. They laughed in the face of danger and skillfully handled their business, man-style.



Nowadays, badass heroes aren't limited to the male of the species. Hollywood has since opened its doors (narrowly) for tough heroines, like Ripley, played by Sigourney Weaver, in "Alien" (1979). And Ripley paved the way for today's crop of heroes, led by Jennifer Lawrence's Katniss Everdeen in "The Hunger Games"



Here are 11 of the toughest and most badass American actors -- male and female -- ever to grace the silver screen.



Article photo courtesy of Everett Collection





from The Moviefone Blog http://ift.tt/1koz4Cz

via IFTTT

Samuel L. Jackson on Nick Fury, Race in Hollywood, and the Laurence Fishburne Incident

samuel l jackson

I'm nervous. Why? Because I'm about to enter a room and interview Samuel L. Jackson, one of those great actors who kind of defines the term "badass" in Hollywood. You need attitude, a sharp tongue, and a withering way with words? Call Samuel L. Jackson.



Marvel called him seven years ago to play Nick Fury, director of covert government agency S.H.I.E.L.D., in a cameo at the end of the first "Iron Man," and has kept him on speed dial ever since. Now, having played Fury six times -- and being bumped up to a lead in "The Avengers" and this week's "Captain America: The Winter Soldier" -- Jackson's next stop as Fury is "The Avengers: Age of Ultron."



I sat down with Jackson at a hotel in Beverly Hills, where the actor -- who's pretty laid-back face to face -- talked about Nick Fury, why he waves hello at his TV, and the "Laurence Fishburne incident." And yes, he did, in fact, call me out on something.



Moviefone: When you first did that cameo at the end of "Iron Man," did you know already that this could become a thing like for the next ten years?



Well, the nine-picture deal was signed before I did the cameo. They were like, "Okay, this is gonna be the introduction." I was like, "And that's gonna count as one of the films?"



And did it count?



Yeah.



You've gotten to do more in each movie, so, naturally, people have asked if there's going to be a Nick Fury movie.



People still ask that.



Would you like that, or do you like being sort of the straw that stirs the drink for the other heroes?



Oh, I'd love to do a Nick Fury film, but it would probably involve all these people also in the same way. I mean, the "Iron Man" standalone is kind of different. But, I mean, Nick being Nick and where he is in terms of S.H.I.E.L.D. and all this other stuff, I always imagined that there would be some of these other people involved in that somewhere and in some way. It would be interesting to find out what they think his development was. I often think about his relationship to Cap. He's sort of ageless. Right now I'm not real sure, because, you know, the Nick Fury I remember was a guy with a patch in World War II or whatever. So how old is this dude? And why is he still around and so vital?



This movie touches on some political realities of today. Do you see Nick as comparable to some of these guys, like the head of the NSA, who think they're doing the right thing, but...



Yeah, of course. I'm a product of the '60s, so I don't know if people in those particular jobs even think they're doing the right thing. They're just doing a thing that they sort of believe in and some of them do it because they know it's a necessary evil. And I think Nick has that whole necessary evil idea that some of the things you're doing aren't right, that you shouldn't be doing some of this stuff. Or that the general public would look at it as wrong. It's like, you know, people saying they just discovered the NSA is listening to their conversations. It's like, really, you just figured that out? Where've you been living?



You know, when I'm sitting at home watching TV sometimes and I'm watching certain kinds of shows I kind of wave at the TV, because I figure somebody's watching me watch that. But I'm just one of those people because I'm a product of the '60s, and I think the government's been trying to get in our lives for a very long time. I close my computer when it's off, you know, because I don't want my camera just open sitting around.



Good idea.



But I think Nick is one of those pragmatist kind of guys that knows that, you know, evil's all around. And when he said don't trust anybody, he means it. The closest thing he has to trust is Natasha. There's a scene missing from this film actually where she's kind of bent out of shape because he didn't tell her he was gonna be doing this thing that he did. And she's like, "Well, you tell me everything." It's like, "Well, apparently, I don't tell you everything," which gives her pause. She's like, "I've been buying into something with you that's not honest either."



He's an island in the midst of all this stuff. Or he sees himself as that. So he only throws out bits of information to whoever needs it. The way he tells Cap, you know. Everything's compartmentalized.



Nick Fury started out in the comics as a white guy, but I don't remember the same outcry when they made him black in the comics and then cast you in the movies as they're making now over Michael B. Jordan playing Human Torch in "The Fantastic Four."



I was surprised that there hadn't been more outrage or outcry, but I guess the audience now that's watching these films -- a lot of them haven't gone back in that comic book history to see that, you know. When somebody says David Hasselhoff played Nick Fury, people kind of dismiss it as, "Well, that had to be f**ked up because David Hasselhoff did it." So, they don't see it that way, but yet, still this week, I look online and, you know, now people are all bitched out because Quvenzhane (Wallis) is playing Annie (in the new film version of the musical "Annie"). It's kind of like, it's a f**king fantasy, you know. People do this kind of thing all the time. It's another iteration of Annie so accept it or don't accept it.



You had that incident recently where you were being interviewed on the morning news in Los Angeles, and the entertainment reporter thought you were Laurence Fishburne.



Yeah.



Did he ever apologize to you in person?



He was in the room yesterday [doing interviews for "Captain America"]. The elephant was sitting there the whole time and he finally got around to it and said, you know, "Are we okay?" "Yeah man." You know, I was never angry. I was having fun.



You pretty much owned him.



I watched the Super Bowl and if he was talking about the "Captain America" trailer he should have identified it as a trailer and not a commercial. So the jargon was wrong. Even though he may say, "Well, I meant the Captain America commercial." But he didn't. I went straight to Laurence Fishburne. That's happened before. People mistake us all the time. And it was an opportunity for me to have some fun, do something different other than having a bullsh*t interview about "RoboCop."



So, I just wouldn't let him off the hook. And I thought about all the commercials that I watch because I watch a lot of television and I see a lot more black people in commercials now than I used to see. When I was auditioning for commercials, I never looked like the guy that had a dog and two cars and a kid and all this stuff, so I didn't get commercials. Now, kids have dreadlocks and all the things that I had, but they wouldn't let me do commercials because they didn't think the rest of society wanted to buy products that had that guy talking about it. So it's very different.



But it was just an opportunity for me to have some fun. I was never angry. It was never a rant. It was described as so many different things. CNN said I was ranting at the guy and a lot of people online said I played the race card. I said, "Well, what other card was I supposed to f**king play?" We're actually talking about him mistaking me for another black actor, not Al Pacino.



Let me ask you about a couple of upcoming things. You're in "Cell," with John Cusack, which is based on a Stephen King book. You and Cusack did another King movie together, "1408," which did quite well. Was it fun to team up with him again?



Yeah, I like John, you know. We had a great time doing it. An interesting story. Another one of those things that's sort of timely, that people talk about it all the time -- using cell phones as a weapon of sorts or something that changes the world in another kind of way. So yeah, you know, Stephen wrote that book a few years ago and it's kind of real timely now.



And you're also playing the President in "The Secret Service"...



No. That's two different movies. I actually play the President in a film called "Big Game."



Oh, I'm sorry. My mistake.



"Big Game" is an interesting film by a young Finnish filmmaker. Just me and a kid out in the wilderness and some terrorists trying to find me and hold me hostage and whatever. An adventure film and sort of a coming-of-age film for the kid who was in it because he's actually on his manhood trek or something that they do in Finland where you have to go out and kill something. He finds me and he's sort of a nerd but he pretends to be a woodsman. So it's interesting that the kid grows up in another kind of way while we're out there in the woods.



"The Secret Service" is based on a graphic novel.



Yeah. It's a graphic novel. Matthew Vaughn's directing it. With Colin Firth and Michael Caine and a lot of people. It's gonna be fun.



I looked quickly and I totally confused the titles.



No, it's okay. I'll correct you.



"Captain America: The Winter Soldier" hits theaters April 4.



Photo by Francois Durand/Getty Images






from The Moviefone Blog http://ift.tt/1mvQVcb

via IFTTT

A 'Wicked' Movie Is Sort of Kind of Maybe Still Happening

wicked movie

Though it recently celebrated its 10th year on Broadway, the "Wizard of Oz" prequel musical "Wicked" has yet to see a big screen adaptation. That could change soon, though, if original composer Stephen Schwartz has anything to say about it.



In an interview with Vulture, Schwartz admitted that there were still no concrete plans in place to produce a "Wicked" movie, though that doesn't mean he's given up hope for the project. In fact, the composer says that after a handful of false starts that date back several years, it seems there's finally some good news on the film front.



"We're starting to do some work on it," Schwartz said of the adaptation. "We've actually started gearing up on it a little bit."



While there's no timeline yet -- "I don't know exactly how many years away it is," Schwartz said -- the composer told Vulture that he and his creative team were already thinking about some of the big picture questions behind adapting the stage show into film.



"What are we going to change?" Schwartz said. "What are we going to keep? How do you use a whole new language and medium to tell the story? [We can] really look at it again and say, 'Oh, we can do this, and we've always wanted to do that and we couldn't onstage, but we can in a movie.' We're actually having a blast."



We can't wait to hear more. Fingers crossed a "Wicked" flick defies gravity naysayers and comes to fruition.



Photo by AP Photo/Brinkoff-Mogenburg





from The Moviefone Blog http://ift.tt/1gXJFGA

via IFTTT